Case study - Israel

Adini Bruria, Manfred S. Green, Daniel Laor

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The risk of bioterrorism in Israel has been perceived in the last few decades as a very serious threat. Maintaining preparedness for both natural and human-made biological events poses a great challenge to the healthcare system. The Israeli model for emergency preparedness is based on five main components: (1) comprehensive contingency planning, (2) command of operations, (3) central control, (4) coordination and cooperation, and (5) capacity building of healthcare personnel. The response for all types of emergencies is based on the all-hazards approach. Three main legal frameworks facilitate effective management of the healthcare system during times of emergency, including the Public Health Ordinance (1940), the Civil Defense Law (1951) and the National Health Insurance Act (1995). These allow for great flexibility and wide authority of the health care leaders to manage responses to communicable diseases, pandemics and bioterror events.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBiopreparedness and Public Health
Subtitle of host publicationExploring Synergies
EditorsIris Hunger, Vladan Radosavljevic, Goran Belojevic, Lisa Rotz
Pages131-145
Number of pages15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Publication series

NameNATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology
ISSN (Print)1874-6489

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry (all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Case study - Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this