Can the error detection mechanism benefit from training the working memory? A comparison between dyslexics and controls - An ERP study

Tzipi Horowitz Kraus, Zvia Breznitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Based on the relationship between working memory and error detection, we investigated the capacity of adult dyslexic readers' working memory to change as a result of training, and the impact of training on the error detection mechanism. Methodology: 27 dyslexics and 34 controls, all university students, participated in the study. ERP methodology and behavioral measures were employed prior to, immediately after, and 6 months after training. The CogniFit Personal Coach Program, which consists of 24 sessions of direct training of working memory skills, was used. Findings: Both groups of readers gained from the training program but the dyslexic readers gained significantly more. In the dyslexic group, digit span increased from 9.84±3.15 to 10.79±3.03. Working memory training significantly increased the number of words per minute read correctly by 14.73%. Adult brain activity changed as a result of training, evidenced by an increase in both working memory capacity and the amplitude of the Error-related Negativity (ERN) component (24.71%). When ERN amplitudes increased, the percentage of errors on the Sternberg tests decreased. Conclusions: We suggest that by expanding the working memory capacity, larger units of information are retained in the system, enabling more effective error detection. The crucial functioning of the central-executive as a sub-component of the working memory is also discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere7141
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume4
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 25 Sep 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can the error detection mechanism benefit from training the working memory? A comparison between dyslexics and controls - An ERP study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this