CADD: A seamless solution to the Domain Decomposition problem of subdomain boundaries and cross-points

Dan Gordon, Rachel Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The solution of wave problems using Domain Decomposition (DD) requires that the subdomain boundaries should be virtually non-existent, so that waves are not affected by the boundaries. This is a primary problem in DD, and it intensifies in the case of cross-points at which three or more subdomains meet. This topic has received a lot of attention in recent years, with special treatment of cross-points. This paper explains and demonstrates that this problem does not exist in Component-Averaged Domain Decomposition (CADD). CADD is implemented here with the authors’ CARP-CG algorithm, but it is shown that other implementations are also possible. The reason for the non-existence of this problem in CARP-CG is that in some superspace of the problem space, CARP-CG is mathematically equivalent to the CG acceleration of the Kaczmarz algorithm with cyclic relaxation parameters, applied to a single linear system. Due to its advantages, CARP-CG was adopted by some geophysics researchers as the solver of the Helmholtz and the elastic wave equations for full waveform inversion (FWI).

Original languageEnglish
Article number102649
JournalWave Motion
Volume98
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

  • CADD
  • CARP
  • CARP-CG
  • CGMN
  • Component-averaged domain decomposition
  • Elastic wave equation
  • Helmholtz equation
  • Kaczmarz
  • Linear equations
  • Parallel processing
  • Partial differential equations
  • Sparse systems
  • Wave problems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • General Physics and Astronomy
  • Computational Mathematics
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CADD: A seamless solution to the Domain Decomposition problem of subdomain boundaries and cross-points'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this