Buyer’s right to avoid the contract: Comparison between provisions of the CISG (Article 49) and the counterpart provisions of the PECL (Articles 9:301, 9:303, and 8:106)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Avoidance (“termination” in the context of the PECL) of the contract is normally the most extreme measure a party may take in response to a breach (“non-performance” in the context of the PECL) of contract. Avoidance puts a stop to any future performance, except for contractual performances designated to take effect upon avoidance, such as dispute resolution clauses or liquidated damages. (Any restitution following avoidance is not, properly speaking, a contractual performance, but a statutory or common law requirement, as the case may be). Both the CISG and the PECL offer aggrieved parties less extreme measures to deal with breach or with anticipatory breach, such as suspension of performance and requirement of assurances, requirement of performance, or unilateral price reduction. They likewise contain various cure measures that – when applied or applicable – allow for delayed or remedial performance and thus either delay recourse to avoidance or render it unnecessary. In this, both the CISG and PECL manifest a “relational” bias; namely, they attempt to salvage fractured contractual relations by providing an escalation of remedial measures, whose eventual failure ultimately leads to breaking up of the contractual framework through avoidance. In this, the CISG and PECL differ from several national systems that either allow for avoidance in cases of lesser breaches or simply fail to offer such sliding scales.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAn International Approach to the Interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as Uniform Sales Law
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages397-410
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9780511511417
ISBN (Print)0521868726, 9780521868723
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2007

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© John Felemegas 2007.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Buyer’s right to avoid the contract: Comparison between provisions of the CISG (Article 49) and the counterpart provisions of the PECL (Articles 9:301, 9:303, and 8:106)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this