Abstract
City service delivery requires planners and city managers to move beyond the public-private dichotomy and explore the benefits of interaction between markets and planning. Using International City County Management survey data on US local governments from 1992, 1997 and 2002, we find a shift where reverse contracting (re-internalisation) now exceeds the level of new contracting out (privatisation). We model how a theoretical shift from new public management to new public service in public administration mirrors a behavioural shift among city managers. Results confirm the need to balance economic concerns with political engagement of citizens and lend empirical support to a theory of social choice that links communicative planning with market management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 555-572 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Local Government Studies |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the market versus planning dichotomy: Understanding privatisation and its reverse in US cities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver