Abstract
This qualitative study examines criminal defendants who waived legal representation to self-represent in court. Through interviews with 16 participants and courtroom observations, findings reveal intersecting factors driving this decision: mental health challenges, desire for autonomy, attorney mistrust, dissatisfaction with past legal experiences, and underestimation of legal complexities. The research highlights defendants' vulnerability when exercising this right and connects negative prior legal encounters with self-representation choices. These insights into Israeli pro se defense suggest policy reforms balancing autonomy with support mechanisms. By prioritizing defendants' narratives, this research illuminates self-representation's social and psychological dimensions, advancing discourse on this understudied phenomenon.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Behavioral Sciences and the Law |
| Early online date | 28 Mar 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| State | E-pub ahead of print - 28 Mar 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). Behavioral Sciences & the Law published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords
- autonomy
- defendant experiences
- defendant motivations
- mental capacity and waiver of counsel
- pro se defense
- self-representation
- vulnerable defendants
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Law