Between appropriation and representation: Aristotle and the concept of imitation in Greek thought

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Imitation may be understood as either appropriating the imitated qualities or representing them. This distinction, which seems obvious, was far from it in antiquity. Plato almost systematically discards imitation: representing characters leads directly to assuming their behavior. Aristotle is the first to clearly separate these two meanings, regarding humans as developing from appropriative imitation to enjoyment of artistic representation. In post-Aristotelian writing that distinction is blurred again: artistic imitation is conceived as appropriation of classical literary models, which are deemed ideal representations of nature. It will be a long time before Aristotle's clear distinction comes to life again in modernity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)468-486
Number of pages19
JournalPhilosophy and Literature
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Johns Hopkins University Press.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Between appropriation and representation: Aristotle and the concept of imitation in Greek thought'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this