Abstract
At least ninety percent (90%) of American parents, mothers and fathers, say they are experiencing an acute shortage of time spent with family and an intense work-family conflict. This article provides a history and a theory that should inform our conceptualization of work-family regulation. It points to the neglected history of working-class social feminism. It shows how working-class social feminists at the beginning of the twentieth century advocated for “constructive feminism” — government support, by way of labor regulation, of what this article terms “multidimensionalism” — a life enriched by meaningful dimensions of work, family, civic participation, and culture. The Article extends this history to a theory of work-family balance for today’s world, which centers on multidimensionalism by way of regulation. It claims this theory should provide a framework for designing and evaluating public policy, and should inform measures to ameliorate the work-family conflict, such as paid leave, “daddy quotas,” and quality childcare. The Article concludes that to adhere to constructive feminism’s multidimensional paradigm, Congress should further enhance the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 407-435 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Harvard Law and Policy Review |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Back to the Future: Introducing Constructive Feminism for the Twenty-First Century - A New Paradigm for the Family and Medical Leave Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver