ARRHYTHMIA DETECTION IN HOLTER RECORDS: RELIABILITY OF MULTI-LEAD VS SINGLE-LEAD ANALYSIS.

N. Rosenberg, S. Ron, M. Cocos, M. Green

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

The reliability of arrhythmia detection in ambulatory ECG recordings with single vs. multiple leads has been examined. About one third of all records contain some beats in which one lead shows a dominant shape and another shows a nondominant shape. If only the first lead is analyzed, a false negative will result. Validation of the fully automated multilead TELAVIV system on the physician-annotated 48-case 2-lead MIT-BIH database has shown median and maximum errors of less than 1/2 and 2% respectively, in 40 cases which valid comparisons could be made.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputers in Cardiology
EditorsKenneth L. Ripley
PublisherIEEE
Pages415-418
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)0818607335
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameComputers in Cardiology
ISSN (Print)0276-6574

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ARRHYTHMIA DETECTION IN HOLTER RECORDS: RELIABILITY OF MULTI-LEAD VS SINGLE-LEAD ANALYSIS.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this