Abstract
This article addresses the constitutive role of heresy in Jewish modernity. Heresy – defined here in terms of assimilation – is commonly considered destructive to Jewish tradition. I, however, examine Hannah Arendt’s works on the model of the Jewish pariah and Isaac Deutscher’s notion of the non-Jewish Jew to identify a model in which heresy gives structure to a new, modern Jewish tradition. In Deutscher, the analysis shows, this tradition of heresy suggests a universal world-view that eventually empties Judaism of any particular content. Arendt, on the other hand, connects the possibility of Jewish particularity in the present with her ideal of the pariah-as-heretic. Heresy reflects neither assimilation nor rejection of Judaism but rather offers a new foundation for Jewish particularity. The argument shows how the heresy of the pariah is also foundational to early formulations of Arendt’s politics of plurality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 403-426 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of Jewish Studies |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:COPYRIGHT © Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies, 2022.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- History
- Religious studies
- Literature and Literary Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Arendt and Deutscher on heresy and identity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver