Are We Frightened Because We Run Away? Some Evidence from Metacognitive Feelings

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

William James asked whether we run away because we are frightened or we are frightened because we run away. This issue is addressed here with regard to the relationship between metacognitive monitoring and metacognitive control. While discussions of metacognition generally assume that feelings of knowing drive controlled action, other discussions imply that such feelings are based on feedback from controlled action, and thus follow rather than precede behavior. Recent evidence is reported suggesting that when the investment of effort is goal driven, greater effort enhances metacognitive feelings, consistent with the "feelingsaffect- behavior" hypothesis. When effort is data driven, however, metacognitive feelings decrease with increasing effort, suggesting that such feelings are based on feedback from behavior. Both types of causal effects can occur simultaneously.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMemory and Emotion
Subtitle of host publicationInterdisciplinary Perspectives
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
Pages83-103
Number of pages21
ISBN (Print)1405139811, 9781405139816
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Jan 2008

Keywords

  • Emotional feelings
  • Information
  • Metacognitive feelings
  • Philosophical debate
  • Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are We Frightened Because We Run Away? Some Evidence from Metacognitive Feelings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this