Abstract
Background: The issue of confidentiality often causes an ethical dilemma for the psychotherapist. Aims of the study: We investigated if therapists are consistent in their attitude to confidentiality or judge each case on its own merit. Methods: A questionnaire consisting of a series of clinical vignettes representing different ethical dilemmas in confidentiality in psychotherapy was completed by 93 therapists of different professional backgrounds and by a control group of 55 students from the fields of law and the humanities. Results: Subjects in both groups were inconsistent in their attitude to confidentiality in two-thirds of cases, and most of the participants based their decisions on the particular history and circumstances of each case. Conclusion: The rules guiding psychotherapists for the disclosure of confidential information are unclear. These findings failed to pinpoint a common denominator to explain the manner in which professionals handle information that may demand a break of confidentiality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 82-89 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Israel Journal of Psychiatry |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Are psychotherapists consistent in their ethical attitude to patient confidentiality?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver