Are highly numerate individuals invulnerable to attribute framing bias? Comparing numerically and graphically represented attribute framing

Hamutal Kreiner, Eyal Gamliel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Judgments and decisions are frequently biased by attribute framing, presenting either positive or negative attributes of an object. This paper focused on two factors previously shown to moderate the attribute-framing bias: mode of presentation and participants' numeric ability. Whereas many studies demonstrated that graphical display reduced the bias, recent findings suggest that graphical manipulation can nevertheless elicit significant framing bias. Numeracy has been shown to moderate attribute-framing bias when the quantitative information was represented by numbers. The present study examined to what extent numeracy would still moderate the framing bias when it is graphically elicited. The results showed a significant framing bias for graphically as well as for numerically represented framing scenarios. Critically, whereas numeracy moderated the framing bias in numerically represented scenarios, it did not have a similar moderating effect when the quantitative information in the scenario was graphically represented. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-782
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

  • attribute framing
  • graphical representation
  • judgment and decision making
  • numeracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are highly numerate individuals invulnerable to attribute framing bias? Comparing numerically and graphically represented attribute framing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this