Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity, and voice

Mildred Warner, Amir Hefetz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Political fragmentation in metropolitan regions makes equitable and efficient delivery of public services difficult. Regionalism, although promoted as more equitable and rational, has found limited political support. Public choice theory argues, against regionalism, that political fragmentation can promote competition and efficiency by creating markets for public services. The authors assess the efficacy of market solutions for metropolitan public service provision by comparing privatization with intermunicipal cooperation and evaluating each on efficiency, equity, and democracy grounds. Using probit regression analysis of a national survey of local government service delivery from 1992 and 1997, the authors find that both alternatives promote efficiency, but equity and voice are more associated with intermunicipal cooperation than privatization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-89
Number of pages20
JournalUrban Affairs Review
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity, and voice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this