TY - JOUR
T1 - An international panel perspective
T2 - Exploring nursing scholarship in academia
AU - Zlotnick, Cheryl
AU - Acorn, Michelle
AU - Agazio, Janice
AU - Brousseau, Sylvain
AU - Horton-Deutsch, Sara
AU - Leahy-Warren, Patricia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - Background: Boyer's framework of scholarship, the basis of many academic models for faculty promotion, is comprised of the components of discovery, teaching, integration, application, and engagement. Yet, the scholarship component of application (containing goal-based clinical practice) is undervalued by many academic models. Purpose: This study explores the nursing activities currently qualifying as scholarship in several international academic models. Methods: Using the Delphi approach, an international nine-member panel from seven countries participated in a six-question, structured brainstorming session to explore the nursing activities qualifying as scholarship by academic models. Follow-up sessions were attended by six panel members. Results: Panel members reported that the nursing activities, which most often were recognized as scholarship, fit the scholarship components of discovery, teaching and integration but few fit the components of application or engagement. Although this project originally focused on clinical practice, far more recommendations for an academic model targeted the scholarship component of engagement. Conclusion: Academic models' lack of appreciation for the scholarship components of application (goal-based clinical practice) and engagement (partnering with community groups) discourages faculty from participating in these activities. Yet, these nursing activities demonstrate scholarship and are essential for the continued development of the nursing profession and discipline.
AB - Background: Boyer's framework of scholarship, the basis of many academic models for faculty promotion, is comprised of the components of discovery, teaching, integration, application, and engagement. Yet, the scholarship component of application (containing goal-based clinical practice) is undervalued by many academic models. Purpose: This study explores the nursing activities currently qualifying as scholarship in several international academic models. Methods: Using the Delphi approach, an international nine-member panel from seven countries participated in a six-question, structured brainstorming session to explore the nursing activities qualifying as scholarship by academic models. Follow-up sessions were attended by six panel members. Results: Panel members reported that the nursing activities, which most often were recognized as scholarship, fit the scholarship components of discovery, teaching and integration but few fit the components of application or engagement. Although this project originally focused on clinical practice, far more recommendations for an academic model targeted the scholarship component of engagement. Conclusion: Academic models' lack of appreciation for the scholarship components of application (goal-based clinical practice) and engagement (partnering with community groups) discourages faculty from participating in these activities. Yet, these nursing activities demonstrate scholarship and are essential for the continued development of the nursing profession and discipline.
KW - Academic nursing
KW - Clinical track faculty
KW - Nursing education
KW - Scholarship
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186436691&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.11.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 38614669
AN - SCOPUS:85186436691
SN - 8755-7223
VL - 51
SP - 16
EP - 26
JO - Journal of Professional Nursing
JF - Journal of Professional Nursing
ER -