An Answer of Behalf of Guanilo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The ontological proof is wrong because it can be used to prove not only the existence of God, but also of imaginary entities such as spirits of stones and trees. etc. It is faulty because it proves too much; it can be used to prove not only the existence of God, but also the existence of a vast number of imaginary entities to the existence of which theists would not like to commit themselves.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-96
Number of pages16
JournalPhilosophy and Theology
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Answer of Behalf of Guanilo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this