Abstract
This pilot study compares the adjustment to illness, i.e. psychosocial and psychological distress, of 29 cancer patients being treated by complementary therapy along with conventional therapy, with a control group of 29 patients being treated by conventional therapy only. The findings indicate statistical differences in the brief symptom inventory scale (BSI), namely, the psychological distress of patients who received conventional therapy only was more severe than those being treated by complementary therapy with conventional therapy. No statistical differences, however, were found between the two groups in terms of psychosocial adjustment to the illness (PAIS). The findings lead to a recommendation that complementary therapy should be offered by public medical facilities as part of the standard treatment for cancer patients in order to ease psychological distress.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 243-249 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Patient Education and Counseling |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2001 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Complementary therapy
- Conventional therapy
- Psychological distress
- Psychosocial adjustment
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Adjustment to illness of cancer patients treated by complementary therapy along with conventional therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver