Abstract
In this paper I ask how educational researchers can believe the subjective perceptions of qualitative participant-observers given the concern for objectivity and generalisability of experimental research in the behavioural and social sciences. I critique the most common answer to this question within the educational research community, which posits the existence of two (or more) equally legitimate epistemological paradigms-positivism and constructivism-and offer an alternative that places a priority in educational research on understanding the purposes and meanings humans attribute to educational practices. Only within the context of what I call a transcendent view from somewhere-higher ideals that govern human activities-can we make sense of quantitative as well as qualitative research findings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 205-221 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Philosophy of Education |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2006 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:*Research supported by CNPq, FAPESP and PRONEX. ‘Research supported by FAPESP. TResearch supported by Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and DOE grant DE-FG02-95ER40896.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- History
- Philosophy