Abstract
In this article, I present a critique of existing approaches to the distinctive harm of genocide and offer an alternative approach. I draw on Hannah Arendt’s unique conception of genocide, to suggest an ‘existential’ account of the harm of genocide. For Arendt, the distinctive loss in genocide was not a moral loss, strictly speaking, but rather an existential loss to humanity. By destroying a nation in whole or in part, genocide robs us of a variety of possible ways of experiencing and understanding the world. This approach, I argue, is original and valuable, and merits further consideration by anyone who is interested in the problem of genocide.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 112-132 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of Genocide Research |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2 Jan 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Law
- History
- Political Science and International Relations