Abstract
This paper makes a case for Buried Culture—humanly modified packages of sediments and artifacts. Specifically, it argues that Buried Culture amounts to an a-social, literally posthuman, cultural being. The argument proceeds through three main steps. Firstly, drawing on the prototypical example of landfills, it demonstrates that while ontically solid, Buried Culture is epistemically vacuous. Secondly, placing it between sedimentology and archaeology, a diagnosis is offered: The epistemic vehicles at our disposal either acknowledge Buried Culture’s existence as a proper being or appreciate its cultural qualities, but not both. Thirdly, an aesthetically oriented approach is proposed, adopting the analytical reasoning of the art critic as a means to straddle this gap. To illustrate this, a small-scale case study is presented, concerned with an early 20th-century landfill near Tel Aviv, Israel.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 74-94 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Humans |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 by the author.
Keywords
- aesthetics
- archaeology
- epistemology
- landfill
- sedimentology
- waste
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Archaeology
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Archaeology
- Anthropology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Case for Buried Culture: From an Unknown Known to a Known Unknown'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver