Abstract
One of the ongoing challenges of developing learners’ digital literacy is fostering the ability to critically construct meaning from diverse online sources. The purpose of the current study is to shed light on the role of learners’ epistemic thinking on their ability to identify and interpret online source perspectives. The study examines the effect of epistemic perspective (absolutist, multiplist, or evaluativist) and online source perspectives (conflicting or converging blog-posts) on learners’ ability to understand, evaluate, and integrate multiple socio-scientific perspectives. Preliminary results from a pilot study indicated that in the converging blog-posts condition epistemic thinking did not play a significant role, however, in the conflicting blog-posts condition, participants with high evaluativist scores were significantly more successful in comprehension and integration of multiple source perspectives. A concerning finding is that few students referred to author perspectives in their source evaluations. We propose that when presenting learners with conflicting online sources it is also important
to address learners’ epistemic perspectives and to help them develop a deeper
understanding of the constructed nature of knowledge.
to address learners’ epistemic perspectives and to help them develop a deeper
understanding of the constructed nature of knowledge.
| Translated title of the contribution | Who Wrote That? Thinking About the Sources of Conflicting Online Information |
|---|---|
| Original language | Hebrew |
| Title of host publication | האדם הלומד בעידן הטכנולוגי: כנס צ'ייס למחקרי טכנולוגיות למידה |
| Editors | Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, N. Geri, Y. Kalman, V. Silber-Varod, Y. Yair |
| Place of Publication | Ra'anana |
| Publisher | הוצאת האוניברסיטה הפתוחה |
| Pages | 17-27 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| State | Published - 2014 |